Even if you know you can’t succeed

My all-time favourite trope is the doomed moral victor: Our hero is presented with overwhelming evidence that their taking action could not possibly make a difference, and is invited to “take the easy way out”, give up, go against their morals etc.. No-one would judge them, and perhaps from a utilitarian sense they might even be doing more good. But our brave hero refuses to betray their beliefs.

The trope resonates with me because I’ve always had a strong stubborn streak, which I think could be a result of some autism traits. Perhaps it’s also my substitute for religion . Maybe I would even suggest that a religious person’s moral courage is less impressive, if they are acting with the expectation of repayment in an afterlife (but in saying that, I too believe moral acts are often repaid in unexpected ways – perhaps a more secular version of the idea of karma).

I also think of the concept as a potential solution to “tragedy of the commons” scenarios including around climate change. Much like the Sorites paradox, no individual’s action could possibly make a difference, and yet if enough individuals take seemingly meaningless action they could achieve a meaningful outcome.

JRR Tolkien Theory of Courage

  1. I’m atheistic, and in particular have problems with aspects of modern Christianity. That doesn’t stop me from recognising an absolute banger though ↩︎